Unlocking SaaS Value: Why Continuous Optimisation Matters After Go-Live
When systems stall after go-live, the issue often isn’t the tech - it’s capacity, ownership and support focused on continuous improvement, rather than technical fixes
When systems stall after go-live, the issue often isn’t the tech - it’s capacity, ownership and support focused on continuous improvement, rather than technical fixes
Even strong PMOs can stall. A targeted review can uncover inefficiencies, optimise governance, and improve delivery without increasing your budget.
While it might seem logical to delay major technology investments to conserve budget when the road ahead looks challenging, sometimes the reverse is true.
After a project portfolio review, organisations often face tough decisions and the need for decisive action. With the right resources, you may find new ways to unlock the potential of your portfolio to deliver lasting impact.
An early project portfolio review ensures your initiatives stay aligned with strategic goals, reducing risks and maximising value. By evaluating progress at the 30% mark, leaders gain critical insights and opportunities to make impactful adjustments before it’s too late.
Amid economic uncertainty, organisations must prioritise projects wisely. The reimagined EPMO plays a key role in assessing value, resourcing impacts, and risk for optimal project selection.
Getting a business case across the line in challenging times relies on three things: Clear scope, minimal assumptions, and a compelling theory of change.
The EPMO is making a resurgence in the agile-dominated scene, blending traditional and modern methodologies for optimal project management.
As project management evolves, a hybrid model combining EPMO's strategic oversight with Agile's flexibility is gaining traction, offering the best of both worlds.
The PMO is having to evolve to meet the challenges of what has been referred to as a year of "wait and see", echoing the uncertainty of a global community at crossroads.